Monday, October 14, 2019

Chac Mool

Juan Rulfo


Who narrates the story/How is the story narrated?
Filiberto’s friend. He then starts reading Filiberto’s diary.

Who is Filiberto? What does he do? What class is he from? What might he represent?
Filiberto has recently been fired from “La secretaría”. He liked collecting indigenous statues and artifacts. Filiberto inherited his parents' house which is described as big and from the “porfiriato”. The Porfiriato was a time of great inequalities and had a huge economic and social gap, so we can assume he came from a family with money. He also says something in his diary of being in a private college and of having a promising looking future as a young student but did not reach the expectations. So now, he is not struggling with money but needs to be more careful on what he spends his money, like mentioned when buying a coffee or an original artifact, as he isn’t rich at all.

What is a Chac Mool? (internet investigation)
Chac Mool is a pre-Columbian sculpture (the picture below) that to this day has many different interpretations. It is important to contrast that this figure is mostly found in sacred contexts such as altars. One of the most predominant interpretations is that he is the God of rain but to this day it represents a figure full of mystery.



Who was the Le Plongeon referred to on pg 5? How can we interpret Fuentes’ re-telling of Le Plongeon’s act?
This is a reference to Augustus Le Pongeon, a European archeologist from the XIX century. It is being cynical in a way, of Europeans “discovering” pre columbian reliques.

Describe the Chac Mool. What is he like physically? What is his personality like?
He if something scary and dark: “The room smelled of horror, of incense and blood.”
Described as something a normal person would not look like or adopt this position but is still alive:  “There was Chac Mool, upright, smiling, ocher, with his belly flesh-colored. Two eyes paralyzed me, almost cross-eyed, very close to the triangular nose. The bottom teeth, biting the upper lip, unmoving; only the luster of the square headpiece on the abnormally voluminous head suggested life…”
Chac Mool is invasive and is used to having what he wants: “He’s taken my clothes, and he puts on the nightgowns when he starts to shed green moss. The Chac Mool is accustomed to being obeyed, always;
He is wet and cold, it is like a fish, when he doesn’t have enough water it’s as if he dies: “...a little while ago, in the darkness, I ran into him on the stairs, I felt his icy arms, the scales of his renewed skin, and I wanted to scream…” “If it doesn’t rain soon, the Chac Mool is going to change into stone again.”

Do you find any relationship between this story and Paz’ essays?
I think it talks about our roots and why we are the way we are nowadays. Both talk and describe in some way the hypocresy in our day to day life and how we perceive things.

Thursday, October 3, 2019

El Huesped

The story El Huesped can be read first off and understood superficially and maybe even categorized as fantasy or magical realism but when analyzed deeper it is evident it does not belong to either one of these genres. Magical realism uses supernatural elements and defies the rules of logic simulating some sort of miracle that shake nature and the way of life as we know it. It is set in a real world but adds certain elements to make it seem fantastic. An example of fantasy can be Harry Potter, because different to magical realism, it creates an unreal world where fantastic phenomenons are no longer seen as a miracle but just as fantasy.
This story, even with a fictional character, in this case “Él”, mentions briefly this thing lacks life so it can be confusing at first because the reader does not know if it is really happening or not. It is not Fantasy as it is set in a real world but cannot be considered magical realism either because the characters mentions the thing has no life at all and is not really there: “Guadalupe and I never called him by name; it seemed to us that by doing so the shadowy creature would acquire a certain reality”

The beings presence alters the characters routine. The narrator, Guadalupe and the kids are scared of it, but most of all, the narrator is the one most afraid of it. She is somehow responsible because the kids and Guadalupe don’t have a say in it because of the hierarchy, so it is up to her to ask her husband, who is portrayed as more powerful and higher in authority. The moment Guadaulpe and the narrator decide to kill it, tension rises because this does not only mean killing the thing but challenging the husband’s power and authority. When they kill it positions are inverted and the narrator is somehow free and finally had the last word on it.